Evidence in practice
Human Intelligence in Action
What would change if your organisation could understand the human factors influencing judgement, relationships and performance? Explore three authentic client experiences.
What changes when we understand the thinking behind behaviour?
Three real engagements, three different organisational challenges. Select a question to discover the approach, what changed and the evidence behind each story.
01 · Leadership & team capability
One leader changed how they thought. An entire team discovered what they could achieve.
A respected executive in a new role began micromanaging a team they wanted to develop.
They had the role. What was holding them back?
Despite their track record and appointment, the leader doubted their ability in a new role. As colleagues took on greater responsibilities, fear of getting things wrong began to appear as micromanagement.
What did understanding their brain reveal?
Neuroscience presentations, practical tools and reflective conversations explored metacognition, self-belief, emotional regulation and assumptions. The leader recognised that many feared repercussions were imagined rather than observed, and began applying a growth mindset to themselves.
What happened when the team shared the learning?
The insights were shared with the whole team, creating a common language around how brains respond to uncertainty, why autonomy and purpose matter, and how diverse memories, experiences and perspectives shape behaviour. The leader increasingly championed individual talents instead of controlling the details.
What changed in how they worked?
The leader practised responding more calmly and authentically and invited others to contribute and assume responsibility. The team gained confidence and recognition and became more sought out for its ideas and expertise.
What results were reported?
The leader recalled 10/10 feedback from their team, invitations to speak at major seminars and conferences, and a strengthened departmental reputation. Previously unwilling to consider their manager’s job, they now intended to pursue that next step. The 10/10 figure is recalled feedback, not a verified independent metric.
02 · Organisational leadership development
The business was changing. Were its leaders ready to think differently?
A global media company wanted senior and emerging leaders to reconnect across hybrid and virtual ways of working.
What challenge was the organisation confronting?
Alongside investments in leadership development, including postgraduate education, the company wanted to rebuild belonging, connect departments and strengthen shared relational and commercial objectives amid rapid change.
What was the neuroscience-led approach?
“Say Hello to Your Brain” brought leaders together for learning about Brain Power and AI, confidence and gravitas, influencing, mental resilience, the imposter phenomenon, and Brain Capital and Brain Health.
Why bring different departments together?
The sessions provided a shared understanding of thinking, feelings, trust and brain differences and encouraged exchange across functions and levels of seniority.
What did participants begin applying?
The continuing relationship and positive feedback included a leadership-course participant who called Soraya’s guest session their highlight and was inspired to invest in trust-building with their team.
What evidence do we have of impact?
The client reported positive participant feedback and an enduring relationship. There is qualitative evidence of applying the learning to trust-building; quantified organisation-wide performance effects have not been established.
03 · Ongoing executive thinking partnership
When the business will not slow down, where does a COO find space to think?
An operating leader is navigating a fast-growing product, technical complexity and the emotional pressures on their team.
What is making the role particularly demanding?
Rapid market growth, difficult timings and a highly technical team create intertwined commercial, operational and human challenges, including pressure and burnout concerns.
What is explored in the thinking partnership?
The ongoing conversations create space to examine how colleagues interpret situations and how emotions, experiences and different perspectives may influence behaviour, relationships and performance.
What has the COO said about the value?
“The thinking time I have with you, Soraya, is my only chance to stop, reorder my thoughts and organise my thinking. It wouldn’t happen otherwise because there is no time to pause.”
What changes are evidenced so far?
The client values protected time for reflection and perspective-taking as challenges continue to evolve. This is an ongoing engagement, and no completed performance or burnout outcome is claimed.
All examples are anonymised. Reported outcomes are presented as such; diagnostic participation is not implied for work preceding Brains@Work™.